* jeremy <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> At Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:21:10 +1000,
>> >> > Is there a way to cause other instances of Xemacs to write to the
>> >> > global minibuff area.
>> >>
>> >> No.
>>
>> > I found a way.
>>
>> Actually, no you haven't.
> Huh?
Look at your original question, and then look at the "solution" you
came up with.
>> > Not as nice as being right there in the same instance of xemacs
>>
>> lol! Jeremy, you're gonna love this because, this is _exactly_ what
>> you are doing. You are right there in the same instance of
>> (S)XEmacs. :-)
> I meant that it's not as nice as being able to code straight lisp to
> perform a function for you that your current application can
> execute.
I don't understand what you are talking about here at all. And
please, don't try to explain it.
>> But Jeremy, full credit to you, man. This is a very nice way of
>> solving the problem you had. Well done!! :-)
> Thanks! The only problem is that I already solved my original
> problem, now I'm not sure where I can put this to use :-)
Ain't life a bitch? :-)
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: A94B3003>---|
| In space, |
| No one can hear you rip a stinky |
|---------------------------------------<steve@xxxxxxxx>---|
pgpkIExsfNIlr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
|